"平和は通常、大きな善であり、通常、それは正義と一致しますが、国の良心を縛るべきであるのは平和ではなく正義であり、個人の良心を縛るべきでもあります。国も個人も、正義を犠牲にしてはなりません。"
Quote meaning
The essence of this quote is that while peace is undeniably valuable, the true guiding force for both a nation and an individual should be righteousness. Essentially, doing what is right should be the primary concern, and peace should follow as a result of that righteousness.
Let’s dive deeper. Historically, this principle has been invoked during times of moral crisis—when decisions had to be made that went beyond just maintaining peace. Imagine the era of the Civil Rights Movement in the United States. Leaders like Martin Luther King Jr. and organizations like the NAACP were not just seeking peace in society; they were fighting for what was righteous and just. They knew that true peace could only be achieved by addressing deep-rooted injustices and systemic racism. So, in moments of tension and conflict, they chose righteousness over the superficial peace that came with conformity and silence.
To give you a concrete example, think about the situation in the 1960s in Birmingham, Alabama. The city was a hotbed of racial segregation and inequality. When activists decided to hold peaceful protests, they were not aiming for a temporary peace—where everyone just pretended everything was fine—they were striving for righteousness. Their actions disrupted the so-called peace of the status quo to demand true justice and equality.
So, how can you apply this wisdom? It’s all about prioritizing what’s right over what’s easy. Imagine you’re at work, and you notice a colleague being treated unfairly. Standing up for them might create tension or conflict in the short term. But staying silent just to keep things peaceful isn’t the righteous choice. By advocating for your colleague, you’re ensuring that justice and fairness are upheld, and any peace that follows will be genuine and lasting.
Let’s bring this to a more personal level with a relatable story. Picture this: You’re part of a close-knit group of friends, and one member of your group is consistently being left out and talked about behind their back. It’s easier to just go along with it, to keep the ‘peace’ within the group. But is that right? No. The right thing to do would be to stand up for your friend, even if it causes some initial conflict. It’s about having the courage to do what’s right, knowing that this is the path to true harmony and respect within your circle.
In essence, the quote reminds us that while peace is desirable, it should never come at the expense of righteousness. Whether on a grand scale, like a nation, or in our personal lives, true peace is built on the foundation of justice and moral integrity. So next time you face a tough decision, ask yourself: Am I choosing peace because it’s easy, or am I standing up for what’s right? It’s a question that can guide you to the kind of peace that’s worth having—the kind that’s rooted in righteousness.
Let’s dive deeper. Historically, this principle has been invoked during times of moral crisis—when decisions had to be made that went beyond just maintaining peace. Imagine the era of the Civil Rights Movement in the United States. Leaders like Martin Luther King Jr. and organizations like the NAACP were not just seeking peace in society; they were fighting for what was righteous and just. They knew that true peace could only be achieved by addressing deep-rooted injustices and systemic racism. So, in moments of tension and conflict, they chose righteousness over the superficial peace that came with conformity and silence.
To give you a concrete example, think about the situation in the 1960s in Birmingham, Alabama. The city was a hotbed of racial segregation and inequality. When activists decided to hold peaceful protests, they were not aiming for a temporary peace—where everyone just pretended everything was fine—they were striving for righteousness. Their actions disrupted the so-called peace of the status quo to demand true justice and equality.
So, how can you apply this wisdom? It’s all about prioritizing what’s right over what’s easy. Imagine you’re at work, and you notice a colleague being treated unfairly. Standing up for them might create tension or conflict in the short term. But staying silent just to keep things peaceful isn’t the righteous choice. By advocating for your colleague, you’re ensuring that justice and fairness are upheld, and any peace that follows will be genuine and lasting.
Let’s bring this to a more personal level with a relatable story. Picture this: You’re part of a close-knit group of friends, and one member of your group is consistently being left out and talked about behind their back. It’s easier to just go along with it, to keep the ‘peace’ within the group. But is that right? No. The right thing to do would be to stand up for your friend, even if it causes some initial conflict. It’s about having the courage to do what’s right, knowing that this is the path to true harmony and respect within your circle.
In essence, the quote reminds us that while peace is desirable, it should never come at the expense of righteousness. Whether on a grand scale, like a nation, or in our personal lives, true peace is built on the foundation of justice and moral integrity. So next time you face a tough decision, ask yourself: Am I choosing peace because it’s easy, or am I standing up for what’s right? It’s a question that can guide you to the kind of peace that’s worth having—the kind that’s rooted in righteousness.
Related tags
Ethics International relations Moral responsibility National duty Peace Righteousness Social justice
MORE QUOTES BY Theodore Roosevelt
FEATURED QUOTES